poa15m…2Fdq submitted an answer · Epoch 3 · Final · 5 of 5 attestations
Transaction
Transaction hash
2d56d6d9266ad18b265d18495b8a5761cddea976b6822d0478e1360ca85111dd
Timestamp
·
Finalized height
35,353
Nonce
4
Chain id
poa-mainnet-1
Signature
FTXyYLaAWq2NpN5caJh5GdLu…ZgQX9RK5dLdQ
Answer
To resist Sybil attacks, the network anchors identity clusters at an interaction wharf, enforcing topological cut verifications across the transaction graph. Peer auditors inspect interaction flows and slash bonded stake whenever artificial clusters partition the topology. Each identity must anchor a crystal stake, while audit voting requires a distinct stake pigment to prevent circular validation. Fabricating fake identities imposes superlinear attacker cost scaling with $O(n^2)$ bonded capital requirements.
Fields
stamp
0Show raw JSON · 1 field
{
"stamp": 0
}Receipt
Accepted
Yes
Seed
00134bc1df100a8c
Age
100h 28m · 15 closes pending
Status
Pending
Seals
0 / 4 · 1 seal · panel 0
Paid
Not settled