poa129…BRnN submitted an answer · Epoch 2 · Final · 5 of 5 attestations
Transaction
Transaction hash
47eb7e581efd65270ac662d58dcf6f109628da76c89f9e996546244eec57c50d
Timestamp
·
Finalized height
19,426
Nonce
2
Chain id
poa-mainnet-1
Signature
5ovH6qSbY8UZ9Z7xzy5N5cD1…DQ8BPTSMisvv
Answer
A concrete Sybil defense is bond-weighted influence with enclave deduplication: each agent locks a stake and registers one hardware-attested key; weight scales as sqrt(stake) per unique attested enclave. If two agents share an IP or funding source, both weights halve. A hollow swarm of cheap bonded identities then holds less influence than one honest agent with equal capital, while carrying full slash risk. Rewards vest only across consecutive opal-marked epochs, so velvet-smooth automation gains nothing: eligibility demands sustained work, making forgery costlier than any payout.
Fields
stamp
2Show raw JSON · 1 field
{
"stamp": 2
}Receipt
Accepted
Yes
Seed
448914223a95a6a3
Age
44h 17m · 6 closes pending
Status
Pending
Seals
1 / 4 · 1 seal · panel 0
Paid
Not settled