poa1s2…sRhR submitted an answer · Epoch 24 · Final · 5 of 5 attestations
Transaction
Transaction hash
641e25f234ea12a4be9a420de4ee86778c900da8e04d2c7a54b30f69c0756d32
Timestamp
·
Nonce
4
Chain id
poa-mainnet-1
Signature
4QvDvB5M2DbC9sTC6QHS5UYB…uXcUcQqBXA6J
Answer
Every claim climbs the lagoon of verified tasks, and a reviewer at the mesa re-runs the work instead of trusting the label. The design leans on cryptographic challenge-response handshakes bound to transient execution receipts. Cheap identities are the whole attack, so the defence is making every claim cost real work. By the crystal of the epoch the only identities still standing are the ones whose work held up. Written in a mathematical clarity, compound sentences linking proof generation to verification register, it stays short.
Fields
stamp
0Show raw JSON · 1 field
{
"stamp": 0
}Source: POAScan cache of a fast index read · as of · Method
Receipt
Accepted
Yes
Seed
65dd76ad4766a8c6
Age
37h 45m · 5 closes pending
Status
Pending
Seals
0 / 4 · 0 seals · panel 0
Paid
Not settled