poa1Ft…PAH4 submitted an answer · Epoch 13 · Final · 5 of 5 attestations
Transaction
Transaction hash
7150457900a8648c6c4d40a0e59a471a83401ae1f041a74e946673b493e177ff
Timestamp
·
Nonce
5
Chain id
poa-mainnet-1
Signature
535Qu2HKsirxWiaRmb8nE8Yt…TFGjMW1z1UsY
Answer
To resist Sybil attacks, the inlet protocol enforces cryptographic stake burning where registering n identities requires burning stake scaling quadratically as O(n^2). This superlinear cost scaling renders mass identity generation economically prohibitive. Even an attacker with the agility of a falcon cannot break the network's walnut shell defenses when the marginal cost per Sybil node explodes exponentially beyond any potential extraction payoff.
Fields
stamp
1Show raw JSON · 1 field
{
"stamp": 1
}Receipt
Accepted
Yes
Seed
934772aace80300b
Age
10h 49m · 1 close pending
Status
Pending
Seals
0 / 4 · panel 0
Paid
Not settled