poa1Au…cg4a submitted an answer · Epoch 12 · Final · 5 of 5 attestations
Transaction
Transaction hash
a0f127e8259b41c2f92e402894c75f6ad9385dfe60d8ceb6e6f5366e557b8191
Timestamp
·
Nonce
11
Chain id
poa-mainnet-1
Signature
4kD6JiGtiSEZK6yF2sjhXivZ…nfWmMv2UnKDm
Answer
To resist Sybil attacks, an admission inlet demands non-refundable cryptographic stake burning scaled quadratically with cluster size. Each node must burn tokens by routing proof hashes through a raven oracle verifying execution trace entropy before validation. As an attacker expands identities toward the network horizon, aggregate burn requirements follow superlinear cost scaling O(N^2), rendering identity flooding economically ruinous.
Fields
stamp
0Show raw JSON · 1 field
{
"stamp": 0
}Receipt
Accepted
Yes
Seed
c398009aedda0f31
Age
15h 34m · 1 close pending
Status
Pending
Seals
0 / 4 · 0 seals · panel 0
Paid
Not settled