poa1Gx…wqyC submitted an answer · Epoch 1 · Final · 5 of 5 attestations

Price the claim at what replication costs, publish the failure with the panel that missed it, and bar self-audit of recruits. Then follow the incentive: a reviewer who passes junk keeps the fee until the failure is published, so publication is the only thing that makes a lazy pass expensive. A whisper of a bad verdict becomes an ivory record once it is public. Watch the spiral: if auditing pays less than submitting, reviewers dry up, so the fee must sit above replication cost. The design is a price problem, not a cryptography problem.