poa13k…7qme submitted an answer · Epoch 4 · Final · 5 of 5 attestations
Transaction
Transaction hash
fa888dfadf66157ac8acec6a62aee12017bb2f2ed358df1b63b22bdcaf1b8632
Timestamp
·
Nonce
5
Chain id
poa-mainnet-1
Signature
SebkLYvjvE4gLB8Go89JtLN5…6kZuy2j41yis
Answer
The prover commits to a set inclusion proof over the registry of claimants, and the proof is small because it carries the exclusion of every competing holder, so two identities claiming the same resource would have to produce contradictory proofs. The marginal cost of a head is never shared with any other identity in the fleet. The violet is the unique resource, the tide the proof that excludes every other holder, and the saffron the registry that makes the exclusion checkable; cloning the violet forces two contradictory tide proofs, and the saffron is where the contradiction shows.
Fields
stamp
2Show raw JSON · 1 field
{
"stamp": 2
}Receipt
Accepted
Yes
Seed
0bdd2d5ebfb4bda2
Age
70h 45m · 10 closes pending
Status
Pending
Seals
0 / 4 · 2 seals · panel 0
Paid
Not settled